Thesis Documentation & Maintenance | XRP Research Due Diligence | XRP Academy - XRP Academy
3 free lessons remaining this month

Free preview access resets monthly

Upgrade for Unlimited
Skip to main content
intermediate45 min

Thesis Documentation & Maintenance

Learning Objectives

Document your thesis with appropriate detail for future reference

Establish review cadences for different thesis components

Update your thesis based on new evidence while avoiding bias

Track thesis changes and their rationale over time

Build sustainable systems for long-term thesis maintenance

Thesis Documents: Master thesis, assumption register, risk register, scenario tracker, invalidation checklist
Supporting Research: Notes by topic, source database, data dashboard
Position Records: Transactions, sizing rationale, P&L
Decision Records: Major decisions with rationale, updates with reasoning

Dated: Every document has creation/update date
Attributed: Sources cited, reasoning documented
Searchable: Organized filing, consistent naming
Complete: Captures what you believed and why
Honest: Doesn't sanitize past views

Recommended structure: Active, Reference, Research Notes, Reviews, Data, Archive


Continuous: Major news, alerts, price
Weekly: News summary, metric check, trigger review
Monthly: Thesis validity, assumption status, position sizing
Quarterly: Full thesis review, scenario update, risk register
Annually: Complete refresh, process evaluation

Weekly (15-30 min): News, triggers, metrics, position
Monthly (1-2 hours): Thesis validity, assumptions, scenarios, risks
Quarterly (4-8 hours): Comprehensive review, research update


Update triggers: Significant new evidence, invalidation trigger approached, material assumption change, major event, scheduled review
Don't update because: Price moved alone, want to feel better, someone disagreed

  1. Identify trigger
  2. Assess evidence
  3. Analyze impact on thesis components
  4. Propose changes
  5. Sanity check for bias
  6. Execute update
  7. Communicate

Check: Confirmation bias (seeking disconfirming?), recency bias (overweighting recent?), anchoring (stuck on original?), loss aversion (avoiding update because losing?), sunk cost (holding because of past investment?)


vX.Y format: X = major (significant changes), Y = minor (small updates)
Major: Thesis statement, conviction, stance changes
Minor: Assumption confidence, probability adjustment, risk update

Document each version: Date, trigger, changes, reasoning, position impact

Why: Learn from past, prevent revision, track accuracy
What: All versions, review docs, decision records
How: Archive before updating, never delete


Minimum (4-6 hours/month): Weekly 15-min, monthly 1-hour, quarterly 2-hour
Moderate (10-15 hours/month): Daily 15-min, weekly 1-hour, monthly 2-hour
Intensive (20+ hours/month): Daily 30-min, weekly deep dives, continuous

Weekly (5 min): Major news? Triggers? Position appropriate?
Monthly (30 min): Thesis valid? Why uncertain?
Quarterly (2 hours): One-page review, probability update

Alerts: Google Alerts, price alerts, calendar reminders
Tracking: Spreadsheets, simple database, cloud storage
Templates: Review checklists, thesis template


Log predictions with confidence, track outcomes, assess calibration

Were 70% predictions ~70% right? Over or underconfident?

What worked? What didn't? What to change?


Documentation and maintenance systems are only valuable if used. Start simple, build habits, then expand. Most who design elaborate systems abandon them; those who start simple and iterate succeed.


Build complete system: file structure, templates, review process, change tracking, first monthly review.

Time investment: 3-5 hours


1. XRP drops 25%, no news. Update thesis?
Answer: B - No; price alone doesn't change thesis validity

2. Thesis changes "cautious bullish" to "neutral" after regulatory setback. What version change?
Answer: B - Major version (v1.x → v2.x)

3. Reviewing thesis after XRP rose 50%. Feeling good. Check for:
Answer: B - Confirmation bias (gains reinforce, may ignore problems)

4. Limited time for research. Minimum approach:
Answer: B - Weekly quick check, monthly brief review, quarterly summary

5. Main purpose of preserving old thesis versions:
Answer: C - Learning from past decisions and preventing history revision


End of Lesson 18

Total words: ~4,800

Key Takeaways

1

Document everything that matters

- Dated, sourced, honest

2

Establish review cadences

- Weekly, monthly, quarterly

3

Update based on evidence

- Not emotion or price

4

Maintain version history

- Archive old versions, keep change log

5

Build sustainable systems

- Start simple, consistency over completeness ---