Ripple's Creator Fund Gaming Strategy and Outcomes

Publicly Announced Gaming Investments:

Note: Not all recipients publicly disclosed
Known gaming-adjacent recipients include:

- NFT strategy and execution
- Not purely gaming

- Cross-chain NFT platform
- Infrastructure, not gaming directly

- Various gaming projects at early stage
- Specific amounts often undisclosed

XRPL Grants - More Transparent:

- xrp.cafe (marketplace)
- Various gaming infrastructure projects
- Community tools

Grant Sizes: Typically $10,000 - $250,000 range
Focus: Infrastructure and tools over games directly

Conspicuously Absent:

• AAA game studio partnerships

• Major gaming publisher deals

• Esports organization partnerships

• Gaming engine company integrations

• GameStop partnership

• Marvel/DC partnerships

• Guild of Guardians (major studio)

• $500M+ ecosystem fund

• Ubisoft experiments

• Square Enix projects

• Multiple AAA partnerships

XRPL: Notably absent from major gaming headlines

---

What We Can Observe (2024-2025):

• Active gaming projects: <10 significant

• Gaming DAW: ~10,000-30,000 (estimate)

• Gaming NFT volume: Small fraction of total

• Minimal gaming presence then

• Still minimal gaming presence now

Net Gaming Growth: Modest
Fund ROI for Gaming: Unclear/limited
```

Relative Successes:

• Most active XRPL game

• Community-driven (not heavily Ripple-funded)

• Demonstrates possibility

• xrp.cafe functional

• OnXRP operational

• Trading works

• xrpl.js maintained

• Documentation improved

• Resources available

What Hasn't Happened:

❌ Major gaming partnership announcements
❌ AAA game on XRPL
❌ Gaming-specific SDK development
❌ Significant market share in gaming
❌ Mainstream gaming press coverage
❌ Gaming developer migration to XRPL

- Funding insufficient for gaming scale
- Gaming not primary focus (payments is)
- Competition too strong
- Smart contract limitation
- Timing and market conditions

---

Rough Comparison:

- Gaming-only focus
- ~300,000-400,000 gaming DAW
- Major game partnerships
- Clear gaming positioning

- Gaming is one of many priorities
- ~10,000-30,000 gaming DAW (estimate)
- No major game partnerships
- Payments-first positioning

Even accounting for fund size differences,
Immutable's gaming-specific approach
has yielded better gaming outcomes.

Structural Factors:

1. Payments-First Identity

2. Smart Contract Limitation

3. Fund Allocation

4. Competition Timing

Potential Catalysts:

1. Hooks Deployment

2. Major Partnership

3. Breakout Game

4. Strategic Pivot

Current Trajectory: None of these appear imminent

---

✅ Ripple has committed significant resources to ecosystem: $250M+ is real money

✅ Some infrastructure funding has helped: Marketplaces, tools exist

✅ Process exists for gaming projects to apply: Not completely neglected

⚠️ How much has gone specifically to gaming: Not publicly detailed

⚠️ Whether current approach will scale: No evidence of impending breakthrough

⚠️ Future gaming strategy: Could pivot to greater focus

🔴 Assuming fund size equals gaming investment: Gaming is subset of broader fund

🔴 Expecting fund to overcome structural limitations: Money can't add smart contracts

🔴 Comparing headline numbers without outcomes: $250M hasn't produced AAA partnerships

1. What was Ripple's Creator Fund total commitment?
A) $50 million
B) $100 million
C) $250 million
D) $1 billion

Correct Answer: C

2. How would you characterize Creator Fund outcomes for gaming specifically?
A) Industry-leading with multiple AAA partnerships
B) Limited, with no major gaming partnerships despite funding
C) No gaming projects funded at all
D) Gaming is the primary success story of the fund

Correct Answer: B

3. How does XRPL ecosystem funding compare to Immutable X for gaming results?
A) XRPL has achieved better gaming outcomes
B) Both have achieved similar gaming outcomes
C) Immutable X, with gaming-only focus, has achieved better gaming outcomes
D) Neither has achieved any gaming outcomes

Correct Answer: C

End of Lesson 9