Valuing Gaming NFT Projects - Framework Development

Metcalfe's Law Application:

Concept: Network value proportional to users squared
V = k × n²

Where:
V = Network value
n = Active users (DAU or MAU)
k = Value constant (derived from comparables)

Example Calculation:
Game A: 10,000 DAU, $10M market cap
k = $10M / (10,000)² = $0.10

Game B: 5,000 DAU
Implied value = $0.10 × (5,000)² = $2.5M

- Assumes all users equally valuable
- Doesn't account for engagement depth
- k varies significantly across projects
- Early-stage projects skew results

Modified Network Value:

Adjusted formula:
V = k × n^α × e

Where:
α = Network effect strength (typically 1.5-2.0)
e = Engagement multiplier (activity per user)

More realistic but more assumptions required

Fundamental Token Value:

Token Value = Total Value Captured / Circulating Supply

Total Value Captured = ∑(Revenue × Capture Rate)

Example:
Annual trading volume: $1,000,000
Platform fee: 2%
Captured revenue: $20,000
Token burn from fees: 50% of captured
Annual burn value: $10,000

If tokens burned represent deflation:
Sustainable token support = $10,000/year

Present value at 20% discount:
$10,000 / 0.20 = $50,000 supportable market cap

This is FLOOR value from sustainable tokenomics

Gaming NFT Comparables:

• Similar game type (TCG, auto-battler, etc.)

• Similar stage (early, growth, mature)

• Similar chain type (L1, L2, gaming-specific)

• Similar economic model

• Market Cap / DAU

• Market Cap / Monthly Volume

• Market Cap / Treasury

• Token velocity (volume / market cap)

Example Comparable Table:

Project	MC	DAU	MC/DAU	Volume	MC/Vol
Project A	$50M	20K	$2,500	$500K	100x
Project B	$10M	5K	$2,000	$100K	100x
Project C	$5M	3K	$1,667	$50K	100x

Target with 2K DAU, $80K volume:
Using MC/DAU median ($2,000): $4M implied
Using MC/Vol median (100x): $8M implied
Average: $6M implied value

---

Standard Scenario Framework:

• Key assumptions (pessimistic but plausible)

• Implied valuation

• What would cause this

• Key assumptions (realistic continuation)

• Implied valuation

• Supporting evidence

• Key assumptions (optimistic but possible)

• Implied valuation

• What would need to happen

X + Y + Z = 100%
```

Hypothetical Project Analysis:

- 1,000 DAU
- $2M market cap
- $50K monthly volume
- Store-funded rewards model

- DAU declines to 500
- Volume drops to $20K/month
- Competition increases
- No new features

Implied Value: $500K
(Based on comparable floor levels)

- DAU stable at 1,000-1,500
- Volume steady at $50-75K
- Incremental improvements
- Community maintained

Implied Value: $2M
(Current value sustained)

- DAU grows to 5,000
- Volume hits $200K/month
- Ecosystem partnership
- Market attention

Implied Value: $8M
(MC/DAU of $1,600 × 5,000)

Expected Value:
= (40% × $500K) + (45% × $2M) + (15% × $8M)
= $200K + $900K + $1.2M
= $2.3M

Current Price: $2M
Conclusion: Slight upside if probabilities accurate
Risk: 40% chance of 75% decline

---

Fundamental Drivers:

• More users = more network value

• Organic growth > paid acquisition

• Retention more important than acquisition

• Balanced tokenomics

• Strong sinks

• Sustainable reward model

• Regular updates

• Feature additions

• Bug fixes and improvements

• Engaged Discord/social

• User-generated content

• Organic advocacy

• Partnership announcements

• Cross-game utility

• Platform support

Negative Catalysts:

• Hyperinflation

• Sink failure

• Reward unsustainability

• Key person departure

• Team conflict

• Communication breakdown

• Security breaches

• Downtime

• Data loss

• Better alternatives launch

• Platform migration

• Ecosystem decline

• Enforcement

• Classification change

• Geographic restriction

• Crypto winter

• Gaming downturn

• Liquidity crisis

---

Before Investing, Calculate:

1. Network Value Estimate

1. Tokenomics Analysis

1. Scenario Construction

1. Risk Assessment

1. Comparative Check

Avoid Projects Where:

🔴 Valuation relies on "potential" not metrics
🔴 No comparable projects support valuation
🔴 Tokenomics math doesn't work
🔴 Bull case is only scenario discussed
🔴 Risk factors not acknowledged
🔴 "It's different this time" arguments
🔴 Valuation requires >10x user growth
🔴 All value from speculation, none from utility

---

---

1. Why do traditional DCF valuations fail for gaming NFT projects?
A) They're too complex
B) Cash flows are unpredictable and revenue models uncertain
C) They require too much data
D) They only work for stocks

Correct Answer: B

2. In scenario-based valuation, what must the scenario probabilities sum to?
A) 50%
B) 100%
C) Any number
D) The current price

Correct Answer: B

3. If a token's daily emissions exceed daily burns, what is the mathematical certainty?
A) Token price will increase
B) Token price will decrease
C) Supply will inflate, creating downward pressure
D) Nothing certain happens

Correct Answer: C

---

End of Lesson 11